Recent Categories
Recent Posts
- Ethical and Legal Considerations of Bio-printing Patents in India
- Copyright Barriers: Theoretical And Doctrinal Insights On Religious Scriptures
- UNRAVELING AI CREATION: NAVIGATING THE MURKY WATERS OF OWNERSHIP IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
- Harmonizing the Echoes: Evaluating Anti-Dissection and Dominant Features’ Test in Nilkamal Crates v. Reena Rajpal
- MAPPING THE RISE OF PUBLICITY RIGHTS: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREE SPEECH, AND FAIR USE DOCTRINE
Post Archive
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- September 2019
Catogery Tags
11th Hour Injunction AI Artificial Intelligence Artistic Work Bioethical Issues Blockchain CBDC censorship Centralized Digital Currency Covid-19 Cryptocurrency Data Privacy DeFi Dispute Resolution DU Photocopy Case encryption Fair Use Freedom of Expression Gaming Law goodwill high value datasets Informed Consent Infringement Copy Injunction internet censorship Internet Memes IPR Disputes IT Act Memes NFT Non-Fungible Tokens Non-obviousness Test non-personal data NPD Online Gaming Patents Patents Act Quia Timet Sci-Hub Smart Contracts standard essential patents Technology transborder trademarks Well-known Trademarks White Tiger Case
Connect With Us
-
FTC v. Qualcomm: A Flawed Judgement?
[This post has been authored by Daanish Dube and Pranay Dixit, students at Jindal Global Law School.] Factual Background On 9th August 2020, the 9th Circuit Federal Court of the United States (the “Court”) gave a decision involving the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and arguably, the world’s biggest tech giant – Qualcomm Inc. According to […]
